- How We Will Read: Clay Shirky – Interview with Shirky on social reading, which point to the how people use what they read. A few side remarks on publishing:"Publishing is going away. Because the word “publishing” means a cadre of professionals who are taking on the incredible difficulty and complexity and expense of making something public. That’s not a job anymore. That’s a button. There’s a button that says “publish,” and when you press it, it’s done." – (DigitalHumanities reading publishing publishing2.0 digitalpublishing )
- [toread] Galatea Resurrects #12 (A Poetry Engagement): TAN LIN INTERVIEWED – – (DigitalHumanities )
Back Â when I was a student in London and Bristol (c 1979) I foundÂ The Specials’s first album at Virgin records with a sticker on it that read
Pay No More Than Â£2.99
Â£2.99 was a chunk of change back in the day, but not outlandish. Singles were 70p. A pint of bog-standard IPA was 35p. A loaf of bread 27p. I made Â£4 for a 7-11 pm work session at the pub. Plus tips – usually half-pints. Plus a three-hour lock-in on Saturday night if the governor’s mates dropped by. Â So for an evening’s work, I could buy a ska album, a loaf of bread, and two pints at my local. Life was good.Â YMMV.
I saw the Pay No More Than stickers on a lot of albums, mainly independent labels for reggae, ska, punk, and new wave. The stickers were a way of keeping distributers (chains, high street shops, street markets, touts outside The Venue and The Music Machine) from putting their own value on works they were distributing. (Billy Bragg kept the gesture alive for some years, apparently.) With the sticker, the band and label was proclaiming that the album is worth Â£2.99- three hours’s work. An evening’s piss-up. Don’t letÂ the next geezer up the chain say otherwise.
We need stickers like that for textbooks – stickers that the author authorizes, or faculty, who know the value of a textbook, can intervene with. That’s what OER is all about, sure, but there are other texts out there.
I’ve been holding offÂ selecting texts for ENGL 3179: Elements of Electronic Rhetoric, hoping for something earthshattering. The course deals with subject matter that is just coming into being, so there are no texts designed for it yet. I have to piece things together. I’ve been using Making Sense of Messages,Â Stoner and Perkins, for the past four or five years, but the publisher (Houghton Mifflin – not worth linking to) is charging $90.00 for it – way over the top for students. Used copies are showing up online for $20, but our university bookstore won’t let put up a sign in place of the text reading,
The publisher is charging too much for this book. Buy it used online and pay no more than $25.00. Even better, borrow it from a friend.
Making Sense is a pretty good text, not great, but good, published in 2005, showing its age a little – but easily worth $45. The $20 – $30 used price is a good deal.Â The rental option, in which students pay the publisher Â $45 for a semester’s use is bitter tasting. This is to acknowledge that the book worth only $45, but that the publisher and bookstore are going to take a 100% profit Â just for distributing the text. I’m putting publisher rentals in the same category as loan-sharking, which is one notch below pirating software.
The publisher’s price prompts me to rethink content and classroom practice. Making Sense is good in detailing method, but always struck me as pretentious and condescending, and thin in its coverage of classical rhetoric. At $45 I would be willing to overlook the faults. For $90, who needs it? Instead, we can take a little step back in time: I’ll teach the framework of method drawing on my copy of the text (a five year old exam copy), distribute my notes to students electronically, and have students make notes and engage the method in class. A little more work for me, a little more work for students outside of class, but we all becomeÂ less dependent on the text and the publisher. Pity the authors loose on this one.
But, to continue my story, because I’ll be teaching from the over-priced text rather than have students buy it, I can supplement the class with other texts at more reasonable prices. That’s a cost I can ask students to take on. Here they are for fall, 2011:
Rhetorical Analysis, Longaker and Walker. A little thin on method, example papers simply fill space, but good for introducingÂ rhetorical concepts. Student can work with chapters focused on kairos, style, etc, using the method I’ll provide to apply those concepts to digital target texts. $21.00 Amazon. There’s a Cengage version available, too, but their reader is absolute rubbish.
For a text that bridges from print rhetoric to digital and multimodal texts, I’m using The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis, GregÂ Myers. This has enough method (What I Did) in later chapters for students to emulate…. $45 Anazon, paper; $36 Kindle.
And as a recommended text, Lanham, Handlist of Rhetorical Terms, 2nd ed. $23 Amazon, $10 Kindle, used for about $10.
Total, about $90.00, but for a far broader range and deeper set of texts. Texts that students can reuse, resell, pass on. It could be done for $45.00.
Last word goes to The Specials. A message to you, publishers.
markdown and workflow
Now that NV and loads of other iPad and Mac apps support markdown, Iâ€™d be best learning to use it. The syntax is nothing new (except that link tag), but what is new is how to move from a markdown editor to, for instance, a weblog.
- Looks like writers format using markdown in whatever app they like to write in (NVAlt, IA writer, whatever). They then move the html code generated by the markdown app to their publishing space. Some copy and paste, others email and open. Here for instance, Chase moves from Scrivener to TextMate. He basically just writes in markdown
because itâ€™s so simple to get used to and can be converted to HTML in a click or two. I highly recommend getting familiar with markdown if your a blogger or digital note taker.
- fletcherpenny starts in OmniOutliner, and moves towards markdown. Why?
I really enjoy the benefits of being able to create one master source document, with minimal, easy-to-remember formatting, and then being able to use it to create a wide range of final document types. For me, this is much easier than having multiple versions of the same document, and having to hand synchronize them. Additionally, I like the fact that I can write a complex document without paying much attention to formatting, and then let LaTeX fix it up into a nicely formatted pdf.
Rob McBroom wrote an app to convert from markdown to html. He also draws on a tool that renders to pdf.
As more apps include the ability to work with markdown, itâ€™s becoming more and more useful to learn it – and to teach it as general markup language rather than html or xml. An additional aspect of markdown is getting a sense of how composition – and to an extent, design – is separable from production. Markdown can deepen the separation of text from formatting – for good or ill, I guess.
Dairingfireball is the source for markdown.
Looks like my workflow of choice will start in DevonThink. For blogging I wouldÂ move inÂ MarsEdit or directly into WP. For the wiki, a copy and paste will do it.Â For moving to rtf or formatting into Pages – I’ll need to look into that. And, of course, this post was written in markdown in NValt, copied and pasted into MarsEdit, uploaded to WP. And while writing in markdown is easy, working directly in MarsEdit can be even easier. It’s a matter of sitting down and working.
- Developing a Personal Open Courseware Strategy – ProfHacker – The Chronicle of Higher Education – Brief column on making that MIT move to open sourcing content. Plan. Use your own server. Use your own CMS (wiki). Promote to admin. – (Opensource publishing2.0 academicblogging academic )
- Critical Literacy Course – PLE/Critical Literacies open course from Plearn CA. Start here to see how the model works. – (de ple openeducation opencourse newliteracy )
- Hacking the Academy – A BOOK CROWDSOURCED IN ONE WEEK MAY 21-28, 2010 – (publishing publishing2.0 publicauthoring academic socialpractices book )
- Dan Cohen» Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Values – Be visible, be findable: "But in their cost-benefit calculus they often forget to factor in the hidden costs of publishing in a closed way. The largest hidden cost is the invisibility of what you publish. When you publish somewhere that is behind gates, or in paper only, you are resigning all of that hard work to invisibility in the age of the open web. You may reach a few peers in your field, but you miss out on the broader dissemination of your work, including to potential other fans." – (publishing2.0 academic opensource scholarship digital )
- Feeling Stuck? These Web Toys Might Do the Trick – spurs to invention for those who need spurs – (invention cw )
- You’re Welcome, You Bastards – TechCrunch meets Fortune and sparcs fly off the paper. The whole snafu is caused by an intern, that's clear. But it does dramatize the clash of currencies. – (copyright publishing2.0 printing fyc )
- Kindle DX trial at Darden concludes it’s academically woeful, personally enjoyable — Engadget – Knew it. – (reading iPad )
- IPCC Rainforest eco-tastrophe claim confirmed as bunk • The Register – – (Rhetoric Fyc Scaremongering )
- Shirky: Broadcast Institutions, Community Values – "The order of things in broadcast is "filter, then publish." The order in communities is "publish, then filter." If you go to a dinner party, you don't submit your potential comments to the hosts, so that they can tell you which ones are good enough to air before the group, but this is how broadcast works every day. Writers submit their stories in advance, to be edited or rejected before the public ever sees them. Participants in a community, by contrast, say what they have to say, and the good is sorted from the mediocre after the fact." – (publishing2.0 socialpractices editing filters freelancing )