Reading: Conservative Cancel Culture at Boise State

From Conservative Cancel Culture at Boise State

A morality tale

The Boise State debacle should be a lesson to college administrators everywhere. Colleges must be careful not to instantly believe any smear about so-called “woke” folks that gets tossed around. Colleges must investigate first, and only jump to punishment when there is strong evidence and penalty is justified. Colleges must improve their procedures and policies to protect due process. Colleges must have true shared governance and utilize faculty committees to investigate any allegations of misconduct in teaching. Colleges must resist political interference with clear principles rather than sacrificing scapegoats to powerful legislators. Colleges must have transparency and open debate rather than imposing gag orders on everyone. And when someone screws up royally, as Boise State administrators did so badly in this case, colleges must have systems of accountability where questions are fully answered and misconduct has consequences.


Reading: Far-right news sources on Facebook more engaging | by Cybersecurity for Democracy | Cybersecurity for Democracy | Mar, 2021 | Medium

From Far-right news sources on Facebook more engaging | by Cybersecurity for Democracy | Cybersecurity for Democracy | Mar, 2021 | Medium

We found that politically extreme sources tend to generate more interactions from users. In particular, content from sources rated as far-right by independent news rating services consistently received the highest engagement per follower of any partisan group. Additionally, frequent purveyors of far-right misinformation had on average 65% more engagement per follower than other far-right pages. We found:

  • Sources of news and information rated as far-right generate the highest average number of interactions per follower with their posts, followed by sources from the far-left, and then news sources closer to the center of the political spectrum.

  • Looking at the far-right, misinformation sources far outperform non-misinformation sources. Far-right sources designated as spreaders of misinformation had an average of 426 interactions per thousand followers per week, while non-misinformation sources had an average of 259 weekly interactions per thousand followers.

  • Engagement with posts from far-right and far-left news sources peaked around Election Day and again on January 6, the day of the certification of the electoral count and the U.S. Capitol riot. For posts from all other political leanings of news sources, the increase in engagement was much less intense.

  • Center and left partisan categories incur a misinformation penalty, while right-leaning sources do not. Center sources of misinformation, for example, performed about 70% worse than their non-misinformation counterparts. (Note: center sources of misinformation tend to be sites presenting as health news that have no obvious ideological orientation.)


Reading: Local Energy Deregulation Makes Climate Disasters Worse

From Local Energy Deregulation Makes Climate Disasters Worse

Making the case for regulation after Texas demonstrates that capitalism doesn’t do the right thing.


Reading: US Capitol rioters ‘came prepared for war’, Senate hears in testimony

From US Capitol rioters ‘came prepared for war’, Senate hears in testimony

History’s second draft of Jan 6 from the Guardian.

The riot arose from a gathering to “save America” and “stop the steal”, inspired by Donald Trump’s lie that the 2020 presidential election was rigged and widely advertised on social media. Trump headlined the rally, delivering an incendiary speech which he had billed weeks earlier with a tweet saying: “Big protest in DC on 6 January. Be there, will be wild!”

The riot that ensued left five dead. A woman trying to break into the House was shot dead by police. A Capitol officer, Brian Sicknick, died after being struck with a fire extinguisher.

Meanwhile, a new AG is up for confirmation:

Garland’s emphasis on white supremacy, and his clear labelling of it as domestic terrorism, marks a departure from the leadership of Trump and Mitch McConnell, the Senate Republican leader, who tended to minimize the danger or, in the case of the former president, actively refuse to condemn far-right and racist groups.

Heartening to see that Garland will address attempts to undermine commonsense with some distinction. The question is a trap, as Hawley wanted to present the riot as a “peaceful demonstration.”

Garland’s hearing saw him quizzed on his definition of domestic terror by one of the Republican senators accused of egging the seditionists on. Joshua Hawley of Missouri was photographed with a clenched fist in a display of solidarity with the “stop the steal” crowd outside the Capitol, shortly before violence erupted.

Hawley asked Garland if he thought violence against federal property during racial-justice protests was a form of domestic terrorism. Without mentioning Hawley’s actions on 6 January, Garland replied that to disrupt democratic processes, as in the Capitol insurrection, did fit the definition. “Attacking a courthouse at night” did not.


Reading: Epic Games behind anti-Apple App Store legislation in North Dakota

From Epic Games behind anti-Apple App Store legislation in North Dakota

It takes a lot of nerve to outsource your legislative job.

A North Dakota bill that could upend Apple’s control of the iPhone app ecosystem was first given to a lawmaker in draft form by an Epic Games lobbyist, according to a new report.


Reading: Opinion | Trump’s rot has reached the GOP’s roots – The Washington Post

From Opinion | Trump’s rot has reached the GOP’s roots – The Washington Post

Gerson in The Post gets at an underlying reason for conservative collapse under trump: no policy, no ideology, just fear:

There is a natural process by which political parties renew themselves. Newt Gingrich’s combative, uncompromising Republican revolution in the mid-1990s was a foil for the compassionate conservatism that defined the party in the 2000 presidential election. The rise of tea-party, anti-government populism set the stage for a contrasting reform conservatism, which sought to modernize government in pursuit of populist goals.

This dialectic, however, really operates only in the realm of policy. If Trumpism were merely a set of proposals, there could be an antithesis. But the movement fully revealed by the Jan. 6 invasion of the U.S. Capitol is united by a belief that the White, Christian America of its imagination is on the verge of destruction, and that it must be preserved by any means necessary. This is less a political philosophy than a warped religious belief. There can be no compromise in a culture war. There can be no splitting of differences at Armageddon.

Depressing. No way out?

The greatest need in our politics is a conservatism that opposes authoritarianism. The greatest question: Can such a movement emerge within the framework of the Republican Party?

As it stands, I am skeptical.

Doldrums, or Sargasso Sea?


Reading: Fox abruptly cuts off impeachment manager during testimony

From Fox abruptly cuts off impeachment manager during testimony

The AP reports on what sounds like a tiff on the playground. Fox cut away from impeachment proceedings – for whatever reason – and recess broke out.

Williams described the case that House managers were building as chilling and an important exercise in democracy. “The impeachment trial that you’re all ignoring, I guess you’re afraid …”

At that point, he was shouted down by Watters and Gutfeld.

“You’re being so rude because I’m so right,” Williams said.


Reading: Opinion | Marjorie Taylor Greene Knows Exactly What She’s Doing – The New York Times

From Opinion | Marjorie Taylor Greene Knows Exactly What She’s Doing – The New York Times

I was there. History was there. The Republicans were there. Where are they now?

What’s distinctive right now isn’t the fact that someone like Greene exists but that no one has emerged to play the role of Buckley. A longtime Republican leader like Mitch McConnell can try — he denounced Greene’s “loony lies and conspiracy theories” as a “cancer” on the party — but after he served four years as an ally to Donald Trump, his words aren’t worth much.

Buckley played the erudite critic of the conservative through my political adolescence. My hard-left household listened to the positions he presented (PBS, NPR) and moderated our stances because of him. He didn’t change how we voted but moderated positions about g0vernment.

Greene doesn’t know what she’s doing. McConnell probably does, but doesn’t care.  Buckley – bless his iron-cold heart – cared.


Reading: Biden, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Trump Impeachment: Live Updates – The New York Times

<a href=“”>Greene’s snark</a>

But you didn’t tell me I wasn’t supposed to pee in the pool! <sarcasm answers sarcasm>

Democrats argued that Ms. Greene’s comments — and Republican leaders’ refusal to take action against her themselves — had created an untenable situation that required the unusual action. In social media posts made before she was elected, Ms. Greene endorsed executing top Democrats, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi; suggested a number of school shootings were secretly perpetrated by government actors; and repeatedly trafficked in anti-Semitic and Islamophobic conspiracy theories.

What indicates the Greene isn’t fit to sit on committees is her address, supposedly justifying her comments:

“I was allowed to believe things that weren’t true and I would ask questions about them and talk about them, and that is absolutely what I regret,” Ms. Greene said, wearing a mask embroidered with the phrase “FREE SPEECH.”

It’s the sarcasm in contempt of the process that demands she takes the bench.